ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the composite physical function scale in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the exclusive breastfeeding social support scale: a cross-sectional study.International breastfeeding journal · 2026Article
- Cross-cultural validation of the sports performance questionnaire in Chinese adolescent football players: a confirmatory factor analysis study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Translation and validation of Malay version of NIOSH worker well-being questionnaire (WellBQ).PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Composite Physical Function (CPF) scale in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.
methodsThe Chinese version of the CPF (C-CPF) was constructed by following Brislin's guidelines. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the measurement properties of the C-CPF in 477 eligible older adults. Factor analysis, hypotheses testing, internal consistency and test-retest were performed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the C-CPF.
resultsThe C-CPF was consistent with the original version, which consisted of a single dimension with 12 items. It had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.901, fold-half reliability of 0.831 and test-retest reliability of 0.994. Structural validity was determined through exploratory factor analysis for a single-factor structure explained 75.391% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis for a modified model provided an average fit index (chi-square/free ratio = 3.596, root mean square error of approximation = 0.099, normal fit index = 0.908, incremental fit index = 0.931, comparative fit index = 0.931 and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.909). Construct validity analysis revealed a significant difference in C-CPF scores amongst older adults in groups of different ages, regular exercise and physical activity habits (P < 0.01). Criterion validity was tested for the correlation between the results of C-CPF and the Senior Fitness Test (r = 0.446, P < 0.01).
conclusionsThe C-CPF scale serves as a valid and practical tool for widespread health screening to measure the level of comprehensive physical function and its decline amongst Chinese older adults. Further research is needed to explore the eligibility of the application of the C-CPF in a broad range of populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.