ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Japan society of clinical oncology position paper on appropriate clinical use of molecular residual disease (MRD) testing.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07597252 (A Prospective Observational Study of Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamic Monitoring Using K-4CARE Lite Platform After Curative Resection of Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Observational Study of Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamic Monitoring Using K-4CARE Lite Platform After Curative Resection of Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative Chemoimmunotherapy for Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Conceptual, Biomarker-Informed, and Regionally Adapted Framework.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Perioperative Circulating Tumor DNA in Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Residual Disease, Recurrence Prediction, and a Trial-Ready Framework for Treatment Adaptation.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- AI-integrated multi-omics platform to revolutionize anti-metastatic therapy development through circulating tumor cell profiling: SCRUM-MONSTAR-CTC.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease-guided adjuvant therapy in solid tumors: Current evidence, clinical trial frameworks, and future directions.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Review
- Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics in postoperative molecular residual disease-positive stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Histological transformation into pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma from lung adenosquamous carcinoma after radical resection of EGFR gene Exon-21 L858R mutation: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- ctDNA in the Management of Resectable & Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for lung cancer: current limitations and future prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Bridging Molecular and Clinical Strategies for Recurrence Prevention in Gynecologic Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Current Status and Future Perspectives of Molecular Residual Disease Testing in Genitourinary Cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Review
- Physical activity and cancer biology: a narrative review of molecular mechanisms and introduction of the SCRUM-MONSTAR LIFELOG study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the 5-year relative survival rates for resectable solid tumors have improved over the past few years, the risk of postoperative recurrence necessitates effective monitoring strategies. Recent advancements in molecular residual disease (MRD) testing based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis have shown considerable promise in the context of predicting recurrence; however, significant barriers to widespread clinical implementation remain-mainly, low awareness among healthcare professionals, high costs, and lack of standardized assays and comprehensive evidence. This position paper, led by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, aims to establish a common framework for the appropriate clinical use of MRD testing in a tumor type-agnostic manner. It synthesizes currently available evidence, reviews region-specific clinical trends, addresses critical clinical questions related to MRD testing, and offers recommendations to guide healthcare professionals, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory authorities. These recommendations were developed based on a voting process involving 15 expert members, ensuring a consensus-driven approach. These findings underscore the importance of collaborative efforts among various stakeholders in enhancing the clinical utility of MRD testing. This project aimed to foster consensus and provide clear guidelines to support the advancement of precision medicine in oncology and improve patient outcomes in the context of perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.