ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Effect of Er: YAG laser and different surface treatment methods on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to self adhesive resin cement.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Er:YAG laser irradiation versus conventional surface treatments: a pull-out bond strength study on glass fiber posts.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide, Ytterbium Fiber Laser, and Phthalocyanine-Mediated Low-Level Laser Therapy on Surface Characteristics, Flexural Strength, and Push-out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts to Root Dentin.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of laser-assisted and different pre-treatment modalities on dentin surface interface and bond strength of fiber posts (In-vitro study).Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Er:YAG Laser Versus Sandblasting for Build-Up Conditioning in Adhesive Cementation: A Retrospective Study of 187 Posterior Indirect Restorations.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Effect of diode laser irradiation on push-out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin using two different resin cements: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the push-out bond strength of adhesive resin cement and glass fiber posts (GFP) at different root levels after exposure to Er: YAG laser irradiation compared to other conventional surface treatment procedures. A total of 24 mandibular premolars were decoronated, root canal treatment was done, post spaces were prepared, and roots were mounted in acrylic resin blocks. Fiber posts were divided into four groups (n = 6) according to surface treatment methods: (1) silane only (control group), (2) Er: YAG laser 1.5 W + silane, (3) 30% hydrogen peroxide + silane, (4) sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles + silane. GFP were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement. Scanning electron microscope images with 500x magnification were taken for all groups. Push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine at different root levels. The difference between groups was statistically significant with laser group recording the highest mean ± SD value of push-out bond strength (5.668042 ± 1.16 MPa), followed by the H2O2 group, then the control group, meanwhile the lowest value was recorded with Sand-blasting group. There were no statistically significant differences between the Control group and Er: YAG group; Control group and sandblasted group. The difference between the radicular regions was not statistically significant, with the middle region recorded the highest push-out bond strength (4.746851 ± 0.73 MPa). GPF surface treatment using an Er: YAG laser is effective as it increases the retention to resin cement, while sandblasting decreases fiber post retention to resin cement. The hydrogen peroxide and the control groups give similar bond strength. The middle and apical regions of GFP have better retention to resin cement than the coronal one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.