Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920508›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Human-AI collaboration for ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a clinical trial.

Axel Bukhave Edström, Fatemeh Makouei, Kasper Wennervaldt, Anne Fog Lomholt, Mikkel Kaltoft, Jacob Melchiors, Gitte Bjørn Hvilsom, Magne Bech, Martin Tolsgaard, Tobias Todsen

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Axel Bukhave EdströmDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. axel.bukhave.edstroem.01@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7919-271X
Fatemeh MakoueiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper WennervaldtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Anne Fog LomholtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel KaltoftDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob MelchiorsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gitte Bjørn HvilsomDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Magne BechDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin TolsgaardCopenhagen Academy of Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tobias TodsenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis clinical trial examined how the articifial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostics system S-Detect for Thyroid influences the ultrasound diagnostic work-up of thyroid ultrasound (US) performed by different US users in clinical practice and how different US users influences the diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect.

methodsWe conducted a clinical trial with 20 participants, including medical students, US novice physicians, and US experienced physicians. Five patients with thyroid nodules (one malignant and four benign) volunteered to undergo a thyroid US scan performed by all 20 participants using the same US systems with S-Detect installed. Participants performed a focused thyroid US on each patient case and made a nodule classification according to the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System (EU-TIRADS). They then performed a S-Detect analysis of the same nodule and were asked to re-evaluate their EU-TIRADS reporting. From the EU-TIRADS assessments by participants, we derived a biopsy recommendation outcome of whether fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended.

resultsThe mean diagnostic accuracy for S-Detect was 71.3% (range 40-100%) among all participants, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.31). The accuracy of our biopsy recommendation outcome was 69.8% before and 69.2% after AI for all participants (p = 0.75).

conclusionIn this trial, we did not find S-Detect to improve the thyroid diagnostic work-up in clinical practice among novice and intermediate ultrasound operators. However, the operator had a substantial impact on the AI-generated ultrasound diagnosis, with a variation in diagnostic accuracy from 40 to 100%, despite the same patients and ultrasound machines being used in the trial.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceThyroid NoduleAdultBiopsy, Fine-NeedleClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThyroid GlandUltrasonographyArtificial intelligenceComputer-assisted diagnosis (CAD)Diagnostic ultrasoundThyroid cancerThyroid lesions

Identifiers

PMID39920508
PMCPMC12122636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.