Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Human-AI collaboration for ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a clinical trial.
Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid nodules and cancer: clinical validation and real-world performance.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Training the diagnostic artificial intelligence in thyroid sonography: how well is deep learning truly learning?Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems in Thyroid Nodule Evaluations by Otolaryngologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- LLM evaluation for thyroid nodule assessment: comparing ACR-TIRADS, C-TIRADS, and clinician-AI trust gap.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis clinical trial examined how the articifial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostics system S-Detect for Thyroid influences the ultrasound diagnostic work-up of thyroid ultrasound (US) performed by different US users in clinical practice and how different US users influences the diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect.
methodsWe conducted a clinical trial with 20 participants, including medical students, US novice physicians, and US experienced physicians. Five patients with thyroid nodules (one malignant and four benign) volunteered to undergo a thyroid US scan performed by all 20 participants using the same US systems with S-Detect installed. Participants performed a focused thyroid US on each patient case and made a nodule classification according to the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System (EU-TIRADS). They then performed a S-Detect analysis of the same nodule and were asked to re-evaluate their EU-TIRADS reporting. From the EU-TIRADS assessments by participants, we derived a biopsy recommendation outcome of whether fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended.
resultsThe mean diagnostic accuracy for S-Detect was 71.3% (range 40-100%) among all participants, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.31). The accuracy of our biopsy recommendation outcome was 69.8% before and 69.2% after AI for all participants (p = 0.75).
conclusionIn this trial, we did not find S-Detect to improve the thyroid diagnostic work-up in clinical practice among novice and intermediate ultrasound operators. However, the operator had a substantial impact on the AI-generated ultrasound diagnosis, with a variation in diagnostic accuracy from 40 to 100%, despite the same patients and ultrasound machines being used in the trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.