ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
In silico pentapeptide design for the inhibition between S100 calcium-binding A9 (S100A9) proteins.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextS100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100A9) is easily assembled into amyloid aggregates in solution. These amyloid aggregates cause retinal toxicity and act as an attachment core for Aβ fibrillar plaques that contribute to Alzheimer's disease progression. The overexpression of S100A9 is also noticed in various malignancies. Therefore, the S100A9 amyloid formation inhibition is of significant interest. In comparison with small-molecule drugs, short peptides demonstrate higher specificity, potency, and biosafety. Hence, it could be beneficial to identify potential peptides to inhibit or disrupt S100A9 amyloid aggregation. Typical peptide design and identification via experimental means requires extensive preparation procedures and is limited to random selection of peptides. Virtual screening therefore offers an unbiased, higher throughput, and economically efficient approach in peptide drug development. Here, we reported in silico pentapeptide design against S100A9 and studied the interaction of pentapeptide with S100A9 that leads to the binding of the peptide with S100A9.
methodDocking simulation resulted in three top binding free energy tripeptides (WWF, WPW, and YWF) with comparable affinity towards a known S100A9 inhibitor (polyphenol oleuropein aglycone; OleA). Subsequently, pentapeptides that consist of the three core tripeptides were selected from a pre-constructed pentapeptide library for further evaluation with docking simulation. Based on best docked binding free energy, two pentapeptides (WWPWH and WPWYW) were selected and subjected to 500 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to study the important features that lead to the binding with S100A9. MMGBSA binding free energy calculation estimated - 30.38, - 24.58, and - 30.31 kcal/mol for WWPWH, WPWYW, and OleA, respectively. The main driving force for pentapeptide-S100A9 recognition was contributed by the electrostatic interaction. The results demonstrate that at in silico level, this workflow is able to design potential pentapeptides that are comparable with OleA and might be the lead molecule for future use to disaggregate S100A9 fibrils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39920469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.