ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Assessment of oral health-related quality of life and oral side effects of radioactive iodine therapy.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction model for Fear of progression in thyroid cancer survivors.Endocrine · 2026Article
- A scientometric study on research trends and characteristics of oral health-related quality of life among head and neck cancer patients.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the impact of oral health problems on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among female patients received Radioactive iodine ( MATERIALS AND
methodsThis unmatched case-control study was conducted on 40 female patients (20 cancer free controls and 20 patients treated with
resultsThere were significant differences in the total number of decayed, missing and filled surfaces, stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow rates, and periodontal indices between the study and control groups in the unadjusted analysis. Age adjusted analysis revealed significant differences in the stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow rates, periodontal indices, physical pain domain scores between groups. No significant differences were observed between groups in the xerostomia severity and OHRQoL. In study group, the score for the OHIP-14 psychological discomfort domain was negatively correlated with both stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow rates. The total OHIP-14 score and its domain scores of physical pain and psychological disability were correlated positively with the severity of xerostomia, but negatively correlated with number of the repeated
conclusionsDue to xerostomia, patients reported worse OHRQoL in the domains of physical pain, psychological discomfort and disability. They had worse periodontal status and tooth brushing habits than healthy controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study may provide a valuable insight on the oral health problems and needs of target group when planning a a team-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.