Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920372›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2025

Short‑term outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic onlay repair for diastasis recti and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.

Francesco Brucchi, Luigi Boni, Elisa Cassinotti, Ludovica Baldari

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Effect of endoscopic pre-aponeurotic repair of diastasis recti on gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: An observational retrospective study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesco BrucchiUniversity of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy. francesco.brucchi@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3191-4369
Luigi BoniDepartment of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5906-3810
Elisa CassinottiDepartment of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3780-6561
Ludovica BaldariDepartment of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7029-8485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic onlay repair (ENDOR) approach is gaining traction as a promising technique for the treatment of diastasis recti and associated ventral hernia. However, comprehensive evidence regarding its perioperative and short-term outcomes remains scarce. The objective of this meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive summary of the existing evidence concerning perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes.

methodsA systematic literature review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL until August 1st, 2024. Articles reporting outcomes of ENDOR in adult population diagnosed with diastasis recti associated or not with primary or incisional ventral hernia were included. Primary outcomes were evaluated based on safety and short-term measures, including intraoperative and short-term postoperative characteristics. A fixed effects model was used for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

resultsA total of 12 studies (480 patients) were identified. Minimally invasive ENDOR resulted in an intraoperative complications and conversion rate of 1.0% [95% CI 0.0-2.0%]. The rate of seroma was 25% [95% CI 12.0-39.0%], the one of surgical site infection was 1% [95% CI 0.0-2.0%] and the rate of hematoma was 2% [95% CI 1.0-3.0%]. After a median follow-up of 16 months (1.8-39), the rate of recurrence was 2% [95% CI 0.0-3.0%].

conclusionsThe minimally invasive ENDOR approach stands out as a safe and effective method for diastasis recti and associated ventral hernia repair in selected patients, exhibiting low rates of intraoperative complications and yielding favorable outcomes. Prospero registry Registration number: CRD42024573235.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeDiastasis rectiENDORLaparoscopic/endoscopicOnlayUmbilical herniaVentral hernia

Identifiers

PMID39920372
PMCPMC11870909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.