ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for PICC-related venous thrombosis in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and preliminary validation of a PICC-related venous thrombosis risk prediction model for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis predominantly based on Chinese populations.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis in hematological malignancies: development and validation of a dynamic model in a multicenter cohort.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Early catheter-related thrombosis in oncology patients with central venous access devices: a narrative review of incidence, mechanisms and clinical implications.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- A bibliometric review of peripherally inserted central catheters: Knowledge domain mapping and research trends.Medicine · 2026Review
- Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a competing risk nomogram for predicting PICC-related venous thrombosis in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical management of a PICC-associated right atrial thrombus: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Development of a Risk Prediction Model for PICC-Related Thrombosis in Radiotherapy Inpatients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Enhancing prediction and stratifying risk: machine learning and bayesian-learning models for catheter-related thrombosis in chemotherapy patients.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Predicting Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Clinical Features in 730 Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate a risk prediction model for predicting the risk of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related venous thrombosis (PICC-RVT) in cancer patients with PICCs. A prospective cohort study of 281 cancer patients with PICCs was conducted from April 2023 to January 2024. Data on patient-, laboratory- and catheter-related risk factors were collected on the day of catheterization. Patients were investigated for PICC-RVT by Doppler sonography in the presence of PICC-RVT signs and symptoms. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify independently associated risk factors of PICC-RVT and develop a risk prediction model. 275 patients were finally included for data analysis, and 18 (6.5%) developed PICC-RVT. Four risk factors were identified as key predictors of PICC-RVT, including "diabetes requiring insulin (OR: 8.016; 95% CI 1.157-55.536), major surgery (within 1 month and operation time > 45 minutes) (OR: 0.023; 95% CI 1.296-30.77), reduced limb activities of the PICC arm (OR: 6.687; 95% CI 2.024-22.09)" and "catheter material (OR: 3.319; 95% CI 0.940-11.723)". The nomogram model was developed and internally validated with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.796 (95% CI 0.707-0.885). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-ft was 1.685 (p = 0.194). The nomogram prediction model had good predictive performance. This model could help identify patients at the highest risk for PICC-RVT to guide effective prophylaxis. Further external validation studies of this nomogram model on a large sample are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.