Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920370›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for PICC-related venous thrombosis in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Zeyin Hu, Mengna Luo, Ruoying He, Zhenming Wu, Yuying Fan, Jia Li

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Clinical Features in 730 Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zeyin Hu *Cather clinic, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Mengna Luo *Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ruoying He *Emergency Department, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Zhenming WuCather clinic, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yuying FanDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. fanyy@sysucc.org.cn.
Jia LiDepartment of Nursing, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. lijia1@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

Chinese Medical Association Journal Research project CMAPH-NRG-2022017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop and validate a risk prediction model for predicting the risk of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related venous thrombosis (PICC-RVT) in cancer patients with PICCs. A prospective cohort study of 281 cancer patients with PICCs was conducted from April 2023 to January 2024. Data on patient-, laboratory- and catheter-related risk factors were collected on the day of catheterization. Patients were investigated for PICC-RVT by Doppler sonography in the presence of PICC-RVT signs and symptoms. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify independently associated risk factors of PICC-RVT and develop a risk prediction model. 275 patients were finally included for data analysis, and 18 (6.5%) developed PICC-RVT. Four risk factors were identified as key predictors of PICC-RVT, including "diabetes requiring insulin (OR: 8.016; 95% CI 1.157-55.536), major surgery (within 1 month and operation time > 45 minutes) (OR: 0.023; 95% CI 1.296-30.77), reduced limb activities of the PICC arm (OR: 6.687; 95% CI 2.024-22.09)" and "catheter material (OR: 3.319; 95% CI 0.940-11.723)". The nomogram model was developed and internally validated with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.796 (95% CI 0.707-0.885). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-ft was 1.685 (p = 0.194). The nomogram prediction model had good predictive performance. This model could help identify patients at the highest risk for PICC-RVT to guide effective prophylaxis. Further external validation studies of this nomogram model on a large sample are required.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralNeoplasmsVenous ThrombosisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCancerPeripherally inserted central catheterRisk prediction modelThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID39920370
PMCPMC11805956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.