ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
An automatic pipeline for temporal monitoring of radiotherapy-induced toxicities in head and neck cancer patients.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic data extraction harnessing a privacy-preserving large language model: a clinician-AI collaborative retrospective evaluation in head and neck oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Digital Registrar: A Schema-First Framework for Multi-Cancer Privacy-Preserving Pathology Abstraction via Local LLMs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From BERT to GPT-4: A systematic review of AI-Driven toxicity extraction and grading in radiation oncology.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Application and Prospects of Large Language Models in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer often causes a spectrum of toxicities. Such toxicities are usually unavailable as structured data and are reported within textual clinical reports. To reduce the burden of manual assessment of toxicities, we propose a language processing model for the automatic extraction of toxicities. The cohort consists of 384 patients with head and neck cancer who underwent radiotherapy, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or surgery. A total of 3510 notes were extracted. The toxicities were then manually annotated. Two tasks of toxicity mention detection and toxicity extraction were defined. Pre-trained language models such as BERT, Clinical BioBERT, and Clinical Longformer were fine-tuned. Our best model achieves an F1 score of 90% for automatic extraction of toxicity mentions. An automatic system enables real-time extraction of toxicities and insights into their temporal patterns, offering actionable data to support dose optimization and minimize toxicities in personalized treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.