Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920320›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Deep learning-based multimodal integration of imaging and clinical data for predicting surgical approach in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.

Yefu Xu, Sangni Liu, Qingyi Tian, Zhuoyan Kou, Wenqing Li, Xinhui Xie, Xiaotao Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From patient notes to prognostication: The revolutionary potential of event-based foundation models in orthopaedics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yefu XuDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Sangni LiuSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Qingyi TianSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Zhuoyan KouSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Wenqing LiSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xinhui XieDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaotao WuDepartment of Spine Surgery, ZhongDa Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China. wuxiaotaospine@seu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-9149

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor cases of multilevel lumbar disc herniation (LDH), selecting the surgical approach for Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy (PTED) presents significant challenges and heavily relies on the physician's judgment. This study aims to develop a deep learning (DL)-based multimodal model that provides objective and referenceable support by comprehensively analyzing imaging and clinical data to assist physicians.

methodsThis retrospective study collected imaging and clinical data from patients with multilevel LDH. Each segmental MR scan was concurrently fed into a multi-input ResNet 50 model to predict the target segment. The target segment scan was then input to a custom model to predict the PTED approach direction. Clinical data, including the patient's lower limb sensory and motor functions, were used as feature variables in a machine learning (ML) model for prediction. Bayesian optimization was employed to determine the optimal weights for the fusion of the two models.

resultThe predictive performance of the multimodal model significantly outperformed the DL and ML models. For PTED target segment prediction, the multimodal model achieved an accuracy of 93.8%, while the DL and ML models achieved accuracies of 87.7% and 87.0%, respectively. Regarding the PTED approach direction, the multimodal model had an accuracy of 89.3%, significantly higher than the DL model's 87.8% and the ML model's 87.6%.

conclusionThe multimodal model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting PTED target segments and approach directions. Its predictive performance surpassed that of the individual DL and ML models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiskectomy, PercutaneousEndoscopyIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMultimodal ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMultimodal modelPercutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomyPredictive modeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.