ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Designing participation-promoting digital health literacy : Experiences from developing a course programme for people with chronic diseases].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient organisations are increasingly calling for a participatory approach to health research. In the "KundiG - Klug und digital durch das Gesundheitswesen" project, the perspective of chronically ill people was included in the development of a training programme for digital health literacy (dGK). The aim of this work is to show the personal effort involved in the participatory development of a training programme and the prerequisites for this.
methodsDuring the project period (April 2021 to March 2023), a basic concept was developed by the researchers and continuously refined in a structured participatory process with regard to content, depth of topics, procedure, didactics and course materials. A participation model was created for this purpose. A formative evaluation took place as part of eight pilot courses.
resultsA total of 20 people were involved in the working groups and the evaluation, including 6 from organised self-help, 3 from BARMER and 11 from the Hannover Medical School. The participatory collaboration was labour intensive and tightly scheduled, meaning that not all members were able to participate to the same extent. The result was an internet-based training programme that received positive feedback and suggestions for improvement from the participants in the pilot courses. The result was a 15-hour online course to promote dGK, a 300-page course manual and six digital, accessible booklets. DISCUSSION: Participation meant the active involvement of all participants in the entire process, a high number of appointments, the consideration of different perspectives and a constant endeavour to reach a consensus. Prior training of the participants could be helpful in future projects. The roll-out of the programme and continuous evaluation in the context of self-help are in preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.