ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Predicting axillary residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using baseline MRI and ultrasound.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pretreatment MRI and Ultrasound Features of the Primary Tumor and Axillary Nodes for Predicting Axillary Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Cross-Anatomic Comparison.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal imaging and artificial intelligence for response assessment to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of a pretreatment DCE-MRI-based radiomics prediction model for axillary pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy in node-positive breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Axillary Ultrasound in cN+ Breast Cancer: Can It Reliably Support de-Escalation of Axillary Surgery?Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Nomogram for predicting axillary pathologic complete response in cN2-3 breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Construction of a clinical prediction model for overall survival and cancer-specific survival in malignant phyllode tumor of the breast based on the SEER database.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Methodological considerations in predicting axillary residual disease using imaging features.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo predict axillary node residual disease in women treated for node-positive breast cancer (BC) by neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), using breast BI-RADS MRI features and axillary ultrasound at baseline. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, women with node-positive BC who underwent NAT between 2016 and 2021 were included. Pre-treatment axillary US and breast MRIs were evaluated using the BI-RADS lexicon and T2 features, including Breast Edema Score. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted for the prediction of axillary residual disease (ARD). A multivariable model based on logistic regression was trained and evaluated on randomly split train and test sets (7:3 ratio).
resultsOut of the 141 women, 41% had post-NAT ARD. Axillary metastasis was independently associated with luminal subtype (odds ratio (OR), 25.5; p < 0.001), anterior tumor location (OR, 14.1; p = 0.008), and cortical thickening ≥ 7 mm (OR, 6.09; p = 0.002). Intratumoral T2 high signal intensity was protective (OR, 0.16; p = 0.006), while Ki67 had a marginal association (p = 0.064). In the training and test sets, the model, which is available online, achieved AUCs of 0.860 (95% CI: 0.783-0.936) and 0.843 (95% CI: 0.714-0.971), respectively. Anterior depth location and cortical thickening greater than 7 mm were also independently associated with post-NAT axillary burden.
conclusionAdjusting for BC subtype and KI-67 index, the anterior third location of BC, a cortical thickness greater than 7 mm, and the absence of intratumoral T2 hyperintensity is predictive of ARD after NAT. KEY POINTS: Question What baseline imaging-based predictive models can identify patients at risk of persistent nodal disease after neoadjuvant therapy? Findings Baseline US cortical thickness superior to 7 mm, anterior tumor location, and absence of an intratumoral high signal on T2-weighted MRI predict residual axillary disease. Clinical relevance Our predictive model, available online at: litoic.shinyapps.io/LNPred_Apps , including breast cancer subtype, Ki-67 index level, breast cancer location, intratumoral signal intensity on T2WI, and initial lymph node thickness, could guide post-NAT axillary management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.