ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Prognostic impact of late gadolinium enhancement granularity in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in diagnosis and management of muscular dystrophies.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to assess the additional prognostic value of the concept of "late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) granularity" in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients to predict all-cause death.
methodsBetween 2008 and 2021, we conducted a bicentric retrospective study including all consecutive DCM patients referred for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR). The primary outcome was all-cause death. Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of LGE findings.
resultsOf 1668 DCM patients recruited (age 52 ± 8 years, 54% male), 268 (16%) died after a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 9 (7-12) years. In DCM patients with LGE (N = 472), the LGE extent, the septal location, and its presence in multiple areas were independently associated with death after adjustment for all prognostic variables (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.27, 95% CI: 2.22-8.22; HR: 5.74, 95% CI: 3.35-9.85; and HR: 4.38, 95% CI: 2.08-9.22 respectively; all p < 0.001). The LGE granularity model combining all these LGE features showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification over traditional prognostic variables, including the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value (C-statistic improvement: 0.14; net reclassification improvement = 64.3%; integrative discrimination index = 29.0%; all p < 0.05).
conclusionIn a large cohort of DCM patients, a LGE granularity model combining LGE extent, location and multiple areas had additional prognostic value above traditional prognostic variables including the LVEF value to predict all-cause death. KEY POINTS: Question Assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is recommended in non-ischemic dilated. cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients to stratify the risk of death, but other LGE characteristics are not currently considered. Findings The concept of "LGE granularity," including the extent, location, and number of areas, provides additional prognostic value, especially in predicting all-cause mortality. Clinical relevance "LGE granularity" could play a crucial role not only in guiding the decision to implant a defibrillator in DCM patients but also in providing more personalized management, such as enhanced cardioprotective treatments, for those with high-risk LGE characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39920302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.