ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Improving accuracy of SUV estimates in paediatric oncology: Recommending against the use of body weight corrected SUV in [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient selection for primary staging with [99mTc]Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT: influence of combined PSA and ISUP grade on detection of metastatic disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- SUV normalisation and reference tissue selection for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFew studies have assessed body weight dependency of Standardised Uptake Value (SUV) formulations in paediatric patients. This study aims to compare different SUV formulations measured in reference tissues in paediatric patients and determine which correction method shows the least dependency on body weight.
methodsA single-centre, retrospective analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT scans was performed. SUV measurements were taken from liver and blood pool using EARL1 reconstructions. SUV measurements were corrected for body weight (SUVBW), lean body mass (LBM) according to James (SUVLBMJames) and Janmahasatian (SUVLBMJanma), and body surface area (BSA) according to DuBois (SUVBSADuBois) and Haycock (SUVBSAHaycock). The coefficient of determination (r
resultsIn total, 461 scans were analysed, including 185 (40%) from female patients. The median age of patients was 12 years (IQR 8-15.5 years). SUVBW exhibited the strongest correlation with body weight, with r
conclusionIn paediatric [18F]FDG PET/CT scans, SUVBW should be avoided due to elevating values in heavier patients. SUVBSA presents the least dependency on body weight and provides the most consistent assessments of metabolic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.