ArticleScientific reports2025
The influence of emotional states induced by emotion-related auditory stimulus on ankle proprioception performance in healthy individuals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Proprioception in sports and health.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human movement is influenced by emotions, yet their effect on proprioceptive behavior remains unclear. This study examined how emotions impact ankle joint proprioception during ipsilateral and contralateral target-matching tasks. Twenty participants performed ankle matching tasks under four conditions: no music, happy, sad, and neutral. Emotional states were assessed using a visual analog scale, and angle errors were recorded. On the dominant side, absolute errors during ipsilateral tasks were significantly smaller under sad emotion compared to no music (p = 0.029, d = - 0.48) and neutral conditions (p = 0.029, d = - 0.48). Conversely, errors increased under happy emotion compared to no music (p = 0.006, d = 0.91) and neutral (p = 0.01, d = 0.77). For the non-dominant side, sadness reduced variable errors in contralateral tasks (sad < no music, p = 0.020, d = - 0.87; sad < neutral, p = 0.020, d = - 0.56; sad < happy, p < 0.001, d = - 1.36). Overall, sadness improved JPS performance, stabilizing errors, while happiness generally impaired it. These findings suggest that emotional states distinctly influence proprioceptive accuracy and stability, offering new insights into the interplay between emotion and movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.