ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of the optimal candidates to benefit from surgery and chemotherapy among elderly female breast cancer patients with bone metastases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is currently the most common malignant tumor affecting women's health worldwide. The rise in breast cancer metastases among patients is attributed to the inherent variability in metastatic behavior. In breast cancer, bones are the primary location for distant metastases, significantly impacting the survival rates of elderly (≥ 65) patients. The use of surgery and chemotherapy in this population is controversial. This study seeks to create a tool for forecasting overall survival (OS) in older breast cancer patients with bone metastases and to determine the optimal candidates for surgery and chemotherapy. Elderly female breast cancer patients with bone metastases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in this study and categorized into a training cohort and a validation cohort using R software. To identify independent predictors of OS in this population, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted. Subsequently, a prognostic nomogram was created to estimate OS at 12, 24, and 36 months. The nomogram's accuracy and practical value were assessed using a calibration curve, area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). At the same time, a mortality risk classification system based on the nomogram was created to divide the population into high and low mortality risk categories, and subgroups were analyzed to determine the optimal candidates for surgery and chemotherapy. This study encompassed 2257 elderly female breast cancer patients with bone metastases, divided into 1581 participants for the training cohort and 676 for the validation cohort. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses validated those variables such as age, race, marital status, histological type, tumor grade, ER status, PR status, breast subtype, distant metastases (lung, liver, and brain), and treatment methods (surgery and chemotherapy) independently predicted OS in elderly female breast cancer patients with bone metastases (p < 0.05). Utilizing these independent predictors, a prognostic nomogram was developed to estimate OS at 12, 24, and 36 months. The calibration curves indicated that the nomogram's predictions closely matched the observed outcomes. The nomogram's AUC for forecasting OS at 12, 24, and 36 months was 0.753, 0.748, and 0.745 in the training cohort, and 0.744, 0.723, and 0.723 in the validation cohort. Additionally, the nomogram's AUC surpassed that of any individual independent predictor. DCA showed that the nomogram could achieve more net clinical benefit over a broader range of threshold probabilities. The nomogram-based risk classification system effectively sorted patients into two categories: low risk (≤ 820) and high risk (> 820). Subgroup analysis indicated that individuals classified as low-risk experienced the greatest advantage from surgery and chemotherapy (p < 0.05), whereas the high-risk group did not exhibit a statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Drawing from the clinicopathological characteristics of elderly female breast cancer patients with bone metastases, this study developed a novel prognostic nomogram to forecast OS at 12, 24, and 36 months, enabling precise survival predictions. In addition, this study also constructed a mortality risk classification system, which can effectively help clinicians screen out the optimal candidates to benefit from surgery and chemotherapy and rationalize the allocation of medical resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.