ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Associations between discriminatory experiences and dementia in the Health and Retirement Study.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dramatic racial and ethnic disparities in dementia necessitate research into potential risk factors and points of intervention. Using data from a large sample (n = 13,733) of older US residents participating in the Health and Retirement Study between 2006 and 2016, we investigated relationships between everyday and major discrimination and development of dementia. Data on self-reported everyday and major discrimination were collected via questionnaires. Algorithmic classification of probable dementia status was determined via a battery of cognitive tests. We used logistic regression models, and analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity and sex. We found that overall, more frequent experiences of everyday discrimination were associated with higher odds of developing dementia (odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10, 1.27; p < 0.001). Estimates stratified by race similarly suggested the positive association between everyday discrimination and odds of dementia onset was highest in non-Hispanic Black participants (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.51; p < 0.001). Our results reveal a link between frequency of everyday experiences of discrimination and dementia onset and highlight the role of psychosocial exposures in health and disease. This study underlines the impact that psychosocial stressors can have on cognitive health. Interventions addressing psychosocial risk factors experienced disproportionately by historically marginalized groups may be crucial in the goal to mitigate dementia disparities and achieve dementia equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39920237What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.