Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Numerical investigation of water droplet collision dynamics on moving surfaces.

Shu Tian, Atena Ghaderi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shu TianDepartment of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Lyuliang University, Lvliang, 033001, Shanxi, China. Ilxytsts@163.com.
Atena GhaderiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Rouzbahan, Sari, Iran. Atena.Ghaderi@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents a comprehensive numerical study on the dynamics of droplet collision on a moving solid surface with different wettabilities. Results of numerical simulations for the cases of both stationary and moving substrates are compared with the corresponding experimental results. The spreading of droplets, lamella formation, and recoil in dependence on droplet size, impact velocity, and motion of the surface are discussed in the present work. The results demonstrate that with large drops and high surface velocities, droplet deformation is strongly asymmetric due to the competition between normal and tangential forces. Also, detachment of the lamella becomes stronger by increasing the speed of the surface; hence, there is only a little recoiling contact with increased energy dissipation. In contrast, the smaller droplets had a quite stable spreading with no lamella breakup at all, which is evidence again for the decisive action of droplet size and kinetic energy in dynamics after impact. Among the other manifestations, the present study points out the formation of a central splash in the larger droplets. These facts increase awareness in droplet dynamics concerning moving surfaces with applications in optimizing the efficiency of industrial processes like inkjet printing, spray cooling, and surface coating technologies.

Indexed as

Droplet collisionImpact dynamicsLamella formationMoving surfacesSpreading behavior

Identifiers

PMID39920234
PMCPMC11805993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.