ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnosis and clinical significance of prostate calcification using computed tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From diagnostic marker-to-therapeutic modality: emerging paradigms in tumor biomineralization.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Prostatic calculi in men with chronic prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A systematic review (2015-2025).Urology annalsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the exact location, size, and clinical significance of prostatic calcification using computed tomography (CT). We retrospectively analyzed data from 5,492 patients who underwent CT at the Department of Urology in our hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. After applying exclusion criteria (prostate cancer, post-prostatectomy, indwelling urethral catheter, severe artifacts, and software errors), 4,805 patients were included in the final analysis. Patient age, medical history, laboratory findings, and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were collected, with linear regression used to identify predictors of IPSS. Of the 4,805 patients, 1,525 had no calcification, 285 had calcification with a Hounsfield unit (HU) < 100, and 2,995 had calcification with HU ≥ 100. The average age of patients with calcification was significantly higher than that of patients without calcification. Total IPSS scores were significantly elevated in the calcification group, particularly in those with calcifications of HU ≥ 100. The majority of calcifications were located in the central zone (79.3%), followed by the periurethral (48.6%) and transitional zones (42.0%). Only a small number of calcifications were observed in the peripheral zone (0.9%). Multivariate analysis revealed that both age and prostate calcification were significant predictors of urinary symptoms. CT can be effectively utilized to accurately assess the exact location, size, and number of prostate calcifications. Prostate calcification increases with age and is associated with worsened lower urinary tract symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.