Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920200›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Factors influencing the determination of dosing weight in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Cassandra R Montoya, Janine Y Khan, Delphine Nelson, Gustave Falciglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cassandra R Montoya *Department of Neonatology, Division of Pediatrics, Northwestern University the Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. cmontoya@luriechildrens.org.
Janine Y Khan *Department of Neonatology, Division of Pediatrics, Northwestern University the Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Delphine Nelson *Department of Nephrology, Division of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Gustave Falciglia *Department of Neonatology, Division of Pediatrics, Northwestern University the Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe the properties of dosing weight in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Infants were identified from a database of very low birth weight infants. Before regaining birth weight (BW), dosing and birth weight% difference was described. After regaining BW, dosing and measured weight% difference and frequency of dosing weight updates were described. Associations with infant characteristics including comorbid conditions, serum biochemistries, fluid intake, and urine output were evaluated. There were 115 infants over 4,643 infant-days with a median BW of 1060 g (interquartile range [IQR]: 750, 1300) and median time to regain BW of 10 days (IQR: 8, 13). After regaining BW, dosing weight was 4.2% less than measured weight. The gap widened with increasing creatinine and narrowed with increasing urine output. The only factor associated with the frequency of dosing weight updates was day of the week. Dosing weights in the NICU appear to fall into one of three categories: BW prior to regaining BW, practical weight to facilitate medication and nutrition ordering, and "dry" weight, adjusting for fluid overloaded states. We recommend using measured weight to avoid a 4% daily loss in nutrition intake once BW is regained.

Indexed as

Body WeightInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalWeight GainBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID39920200
PMCPMC11805894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.