ArticleScientific reports2025
Use of failure mode and effect analysis to improve the monoclonal antibody drugs management process in pharmacy intravenous admixture services.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localized follicular delivery of a JAK inhibitor using optimized PhosGlyNanoVes: a novel approach for alopecia areata treatment.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies as a Breakthrough in Personalised Leukaemia Therapy: What Pharmacists and Doctors Should Know.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitute a new form of immunotherapy that has shown great success in long-term tumour control. These injectable drugs are managed and compounded by the Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services (PIVAS) staff in a specified sterile environment. This study utilized failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) as a risk management tool to manage mAb drugs within the PIVAS. The nine-member multidisciplinary team mapped the processes; evaluated the severity, occurrence, and detection of each subprocess; and calculated the risk priority number (RPN). Further corrective actions were taken for high-risk steps, followed by re-evaluation and scoring to achieve a low-risk process. We identified seven major processes and twenty-eight subprocesses involved in the management of mAb drugs in PIVAS. A total of thirteen high-risk failure modes with an assigned RPN 1 were selected. This selection represents the first calculated RPN values, resulting in a total score of 3375. After a first round of evaluation and implementation of corrective actions, the RPN 2 score decreased to 464. Following a second round of the FMEA process, the RPN 3 score was further reduced to 51. Through refinement, we successfully mitigated the occurrence of high-risk failure modes of mAb drugs in PIVAS. These efforts are aimed at enhancing the safety and efficacy of mAb drugs, ultimately ensuring patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.