ArticleScientific reports2025
A comprehensive analysis of deep learning and transfer learning techniques for skin cancer classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- TriDermCancerNet: A hybrid deep learning framework for skin cancer classification.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- LTPNet: Lesion-Aware Triple-Path Feature Fusion Network for Skin Lesion Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-paradigm Vision Transformer ensemble with regional attention and MLP meta-fusion for explainable dermoscopic skin lesion classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable ensemble transfer learning for skin lesion classification with multi-method explainability validation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- An optimal graph convolutional vision neural network with explainable feature optimization for improved skin cancer detection.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Precision Oncology: Current Landscape, Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cells · 2025Review
- Semi-supervised GAN with hybrid regularization and evolutionary hyperparameter tuning for accurate melanoma detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep dictionary learning with reconstruction for texture recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately and early diagnosis of melanoma is one of the challenging tasks due to its unique characteristics and different shapes of skin lesions. So, in order to solve this issue, the current study examines various deep learning-based approaches and provide an effective approach for classifying dermoscopic images into two categories of skin lesions. This research focus on skin cancer images and provides solution using deep learning approaches. This research investigates three approaches for classifying skin cancer images. (1) Utilizing three fine-tuned pre-trained networks (VGG19, ResNet18, and MobileNet_V2) as classifiers. (2) Employing three pre-trained networks (ResNet-18, VGG19, and MobileNet v2) as feature extractors in conjunction with four machine learning classifiers (SVM, DT, Naïve Bayes, and KNN). (3) Utilizing a combination of the aforementioned pre-trained networks as feature extractors in conjunction with same machine learning classifiers. All these algorithms are trained using segmented images which are achieved by using the active contour approach. Prior to segmentation, preprocessing step is performed which involves scaling, denoising, and enhancing the image. Experimental performance is measured on the ISIC 2018 dataset which contains 3300 images of skin disease including benign and malignant type cancer images. 80% of the images from the ISIC 2018 dataset are allocated for training, while the remaining 20% are designated for testing. All approaches are trained using different parameters like epoch, batch size, and learning rate. The results indicate that combining ResNet-18 and MobileNet pre-trained networks using concatenation with an SVM classifier achieved the maximum accuracy of 92.87%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.