ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning approach for automatic 3D segmentation of hip cartilage and labrum from direct hip MR arthrography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated error localisation and correction techniques for deep-learning-based segmentation of 3D MRI sequences based on feature-derived-region aggregation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective was to use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automatic segmentation of hip cartilage and labrum based on 3D MRI. In this retrospective single-center study, CNNs with a U-Net architecture were used to develop a fully automated segmentation model for hip cartilage and labrum from MRI. Direct hip MR arthrographies (01/2020-10/2021) were selected from 100 symptomatic patients. Institutional routine protocol included a 3D T1 mapping sequence, which was used for manual segmentation of hip cartilage and labrum. 80 hips were used for training and the remaining 20 for testing. Model performance was assessed with six evaluation metrics including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). In addition, model performance was tested on an external dataset (40 patients) with a 3D T2-weighted sequence from a different institution. Inter-rater agreement of manual segmentation served as benchmark for automatic segmentation performance. 100 patients were included (mean age 30 ± 10 years, 64% female patients). Mean DSC for cartilage was 0.92 ± 0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.93) and 0.83 ± 0.04 (0.81-0.85) for labrum and comparable (p = 0.232 and 0.297, respectively) to inter-rater agreement of manual segmentation: DSC cartilage 0.93 ± 0.04 (0.92-0.95); DSC labrum 0.82 ± 0.05 (0.80-0.85). When tested on the external dataset, the DSC was 0.89 ± 0.02 (0.88-0.90) and 0.71 ± 0.04 (0.69-0.73) for cartilage and labrum, respectively.The presented deep learning approach accurately segments hip cartilage and labrum from 3D MRI sequences and can potentially be used in clinical practice to provide rapid and accurate 3D MRI models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.