Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920153›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Biological control of Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria migratorioides using Entomopathogenic bacteria.

Jihan Muhammad, Zeinab Fathy, Saad Moussa

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jihan MuhammadInsect Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Unit, Agricultural Research Center 12619, Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Plant Protection Research Institute, Giza, Egypt. mjihan7@yahoo.com.
Zeinab FathyDepartment of Pest Physiology, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center 12619, Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Giza, Egypt.
Saad MoussaInsect Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Unit, Agricultural Research Center 12619, Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Plant Protection Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of indigenous entomopathogenic bacterial (EPB) strains from Egypt to control the two most prevalent locust species, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsskål) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), and Locusta migratoria migratorioides (Reiche & Fairmaire) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). To assess the efficacy of the EPB strains, experiments were conducted in the laboratory, semi field, and field. The results showed that Xenorhabdus nematophila (Thomas et Poinar) BA2 (Enterobacterales: Morganellaceae) and Photorhabdus luminescens (Thomas et Poinar) EGAP3 (Enterobacterales: Morganellaceae) were the most effective strains against S. gregaria and L. migratoria migratorioides in laboratory settings. Under semi-field conditions, X. nematophila BA2 recorded nymphal mortality rates of 89.31% and 85.00% against the 2

Indexed as

GrasshoppersLocusta migratoriaPest Control, BiologicalPhotorhabdusXenorhabdusAnimalsNymphField applicationL. migratoria migratorioidesPhotorhabdus luminescensSchistocerca gregariaXenorhabdus nematophila

Identifiers

PMID39920153
PMCPMC11806088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.