ArticleBMJ open2025
Establishing primary care physician commitment in Canadian long-term care homes: a protocol for a modified e-Delphi study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe delivery of medical services by primary care physicians (PCPs) in long-term care (LTC) homes lacks consistency. There is no Canadian standard for PCP commitment in the LTC home setting, which can influence the quality of care delivered and resident health outcomes. The PCP's commitment to LTC practice is theorised as the proportion of a physician's practice dedicated to LTC, the number of residents for whom they provide care and the time spent on individual resident encounters. We aim to establish consensus on expectations concerning PCP commitment in Canadian LTC homes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe a protocol for a two-round modified e-Delphi study assessing the consensus of an expert panel, guided by the RAND methodological guidance for conducting Delphi panels and the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) guideline for healthcare-based consensus studies. We will recruit pan-Canadian experts who demonstrate extensive knowledge and experience in medical care delivery and medical practice models in the Canadian LTC sector. A literature review will generate a candidate list of statements constituting PCP commitment. The first round evaluates the relevance and feasibility of candidate statements through an online questionnaire. Panellists may also write open-ended, qualitative responses to add rationales, suggest alternatives and share new ideas. We will then host a virtual synchronous meeting to have an in-depth discussion about the results from round one. A second questionnaire will be distributed to evaluate the remaining statements that have not reached consensus, and any new statements added based on the same criteria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (Project ID #17321) approved our study. The findings will be disseminated through manuscripts, presentations, and the lead author's thesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The ISRCTN Registry: #35125526.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.