ArticleBMJ open2025
Prediction of postoperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing laparoscopic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma resection: protocol for an ambispective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05752773 (Risk Identification and Prediction of Myocardial Injury After Laparoscopic Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Resection), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Risk Identification and Prediction of Myocardial Injury After Laparoscopic Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Resection:A Ambispective Cohort Study.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) resection remains a high-risk surgical procedure owing to severe haemodynamic instability, which can lead to myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). MINS is the most common and easily overlooked cardiovascular complication and results in increased postoperative mortality and prolonged inpatient hospitalisation. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for MINS in patients undergoing laparoscopic PPGL resection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PPGL-MINS study is a single-centre, observational, ambispective cohort study that includes patients undergoing elective laparoscopic PPGL resection under general anaesthesia at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) between 1 January 2013 and 31 May 2025. We expect to enrol 700 patients, including at least 550 patients retrospectively and 150 patients prospectively. A prediction model will be developed for the retrospective cohort (training cohort) of patients from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2022. Possible clinically relevant variables, particularly intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate, will be selected as candidate predictors. Stepwise and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression will be used for predictor selection. Multivariate logistic regression will be used to develop the prediction model, which will be presented as a nomogram. The developed model will be used to assess discrimination with the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve value, calibration with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curve, and clinical usefulness with decision curve analysis. Internal validation will be assessed with bootstrap. For external validation, we will use an independent prospective cohort (validation cohort) of patients from 1 March 2023 to 31 May 2025. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of PUMCH (IRB-K2893). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants in the prospective cohort before enrolment in the study. We aim to publish and disseminate the findings in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05752773.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.