Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39920061›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Trends in the utilisation of maternal and child healthcare services from the public and private health sectors in India, 2005-2021: an analysis of cross-sectional survey data.

Anchal Purbey, Abhishek Kumar, Arupendra Mozumdar, Punit Mishra, Rajib Acharya, Niranjan Saggurti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anchal PurbeyPopulationCouncil Consulting, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India anchalpurbeychaudhuri@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-8599
Abhishek KumarPopulationCouncil Consulting, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arupendra MozumdarPopulation Council India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Punit MishraPopulationCouncil Consulting, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-5385
Rajib AcharyaPopulation Council India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Niranjan SaggurtiPopulation Council India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the levels and trends of maternal and child healthcare (MCH) service utilisation in India across subsidised and unsubsidised health sectors and to explore total market approach to identify geographies where the private sector has potential to improve MCH services in India. DESIGN AND

settingThis study used three recent rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), a cross-sectional survey in India, conducted in 2005-2006, 2015-2016 and 2019-2021. Bivariate analysis and multinomial logistic regression were used to estimate the utilisation of key MCH indicators from subsidised and unsubsidised health sectors. Market sustainability of key MCH indicators was assessed by level of MCH services and subsidisation.

participants36 850, 190 898 and 176 843 ever-married women aged 15-49 years, 4440, 22 500 and 15 334 children under 5 years of age with diarrhoea before the survey, and 2552, 6960 and 6117 children with symptoms of acute respiratory infections (ARI) in NFHS 2005-2006, 2015-2016 and 2019-2021, respectively. OUTCOME MEASURES: The study used three maternal healthcare indicators: women had four or more antenatal care (ANC) visits, had institutional delivery, and received postnatal care (PNC); and two child healthcare indicators: care seeking for ARI and diarrhoea.

resultsIn India, utilisation of maternal healthcare services increased over the last 15 years: four or more ANC visits increased from 37% to 58% and PNC of mothers increased from 33% to 78% between 2005-2006 and 2019-2021. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that utilisation of ANC (67% from public vs 18% from private health facilities), institutional delivery (64% from public vs 25% from private health facilities) and PNC (73% from public vs 27% from private health facilities) was significantly higher (p<0.001) in public than in private health facilities. Care seeking for ARI and diarrhoea among children was significantly higher (p<0.001) in private than in public health facilities; care for ARI was 68% in private health facilities compared with 32% in public health facilities.

conclusionsA targeted approach is needed to enhance the competitiveness of private sectors, especially in maternity care markets, to ensure the sustainability of healthcare services in India. Strengthening both the private and public sectors is crucial, with a focus on improving care quality and addressing regional disparities in access to maternal and child health services.

Indexed as

Maternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrivate SectorPublic SectorAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyHealth EquityHealth ServicesPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39920061
PMCPMC11808917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.