ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism2025
The neuropsychological profile of SSADH deficiency, a neurotransmitter disorder of GABA metabolism.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision TMS through the integration of neuroimaging and machine learning: optimizing stimulation targets for personalized treatment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSuccinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD) is an inherited metabolic disorder resulting in hyper-physiologic concentrations of the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyrate (GABA). This study aims to provide the most comprehensive description, to date, of the neuropsychological profile of individuals with SSADHD and assess whether neuroimaging, neurophysiologic, and biochemical indices of cortical inhibition correlate with those of standardized behavioral tests.
methodsParticipants enrolled in the SSADHD Natural History Study underwent medical and neurological examinations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy (MRS), biochemical tests of GABA and its related metabolites, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and gene expression quantification, as well as complete neuropsychological assessment including standardized measures for cognition, adaptive skills, motor function, receptive and expressive language, autism spectrum disorder, and behavior problems.
resultsThe neuropsychological profile of the study's 65 enrollees [54 % females, median (interquartile range) age 9.6 (5.4-14.7)] consisted almost universally of intellectual disability, delays in adaptive skills, and deficits in expressive more than receptive language. Autism Spectrum Disorder was noted in ∼50 %, and behavioral problems in ∼70 %, predominated by obsessive-compulsive behaviors and attention problems but also including affective problems, anxiety, and, rarely, aggression and possible psychosis. Correlation analyses showed that increased internalizing, externalizing, and overall psychiatric morbidity significantly correlated with increasing age (R = 0.391, p = 0.033), as well as age-independent indices representing decreased cortical inhibition such as lower MRS-derived GABA (R = -0.530, p = 0.029) and TMS-derived resting motor threshold (R = -0.418, p = 0.053). DISCUSSION: The natural history study of SSADHD indicates that intellectual disability, delayed adaptive skills, and expressive>receptive language deficits are nearly universal, with behavior problems in the vast majority. Increased psychiatric morbidity in SSADHD with age-independent decreased cortical inhibition may serve as the basis for establishing disorder-specific biomarkers for behavioral and psychiatric outcomes in SSADHD and other non-syndromic psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.