ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Perceived gender expression nonconformity as an important determinant for vulnerability to bullying and cyberbullying among high school youth in the United States, 2013-2021.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Milestones, revisited: Iterative and nonlinear identity development in Gen-Z.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026Article
- Bullying and depression serially mediate the association between perceived gender nonconformity and suicidality among US adolescents: a theory driven intersectional analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescents whose perceived gender expression does not conform to societal expectations may be at greater risk for peer victimization. Prior theorizing indicates the interaction between youth's perceived sex and gender expression may expose them to greater degrees of peer victimization, as predominant patriarchal standards of gender may cultivate higher levels of vulnerability by sex. However, these associations have yet to be empirically examined. Using pooled Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance data from 2013 to 2021 (n = 158,698), we examined the moderating effect of sex on the association between perceived gender expression nonconformity (PGENC) and two types of peer victimization: bullying and cyberbullying. A series of four multivariable logistic regression models examined the association between PGENC and each peer victimization outcome variable. Results demonstrated direct associations between bullying and PGENC (aOR = 1.20) and between cyberbullying and PGENC (aOR = 1.10). PGENC adolescents accumulated greater risk for bullying and cyberbullying than adolescents whose gender expression matches their reported sex. PGENC males, compared to PGENC females, experience greater degrees of bullying (aOR = 1.33) and cyberbullying (aOR = 1.24). Findings indicate peer victimization may asymmetrically target youth based on gender expectations ascribed to their sex and on the broader hegemonic patriarchal values that privilege masculinity and devalue femininity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.