Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39919098›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Game theory and weight loss: Harmonic evidence from randomized controlled trials in Appalachia, KY and Jordan.

Daniel E Zoughbie, Dillon Huddleston, Eric L Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel E ZoughbieDepartment of Public Health, New England Complex Systems Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-7773
Dillon HuddlestonSocial Network Research Group, Microclinic International, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-6591
Eric L DingDepartment of Public Health, New England Complex Systems Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both behavioral and experimental economics have a lengthy research history concerning the presence of and ability to support cooperation in infinitely repeated games. A workhorse model which has emerged for inferring players' strategies from their actions in finitely repeated games, is applied to data from randomized controlled trials conducted in Jordan and Kentucky; an attractive economic application portending substantive public health and other policy consequences. We find that treatment significantly increases unconditional cooperation (from 27% of controls to 45% of treated subjects in Kentucky, and 38% to 85% in Jordan, with an intermediate level of 76% associated with partial treatment in the latter), and despite all attending cultural and other differences between these two geographies, treatment in each yielded significant and unimpeachable improvements in outcomes; improved program attendance and weight loss. Such harmonious results across vastly disparate geographies is highly unusual and correspondingly impressive. For the first time, we are showing increased cooperative behaviors causally associated with these trials.

Identifiers

PMID39919098
PMCPMC11805351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.