Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39919046›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

Detecting deviations from Kingman coalescence using 2-site frequency spectra.

Eliot F Fenton, Daniel P Rice, John Novembre, Michael M Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eliot F FentonDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-1059
Daniel P RiceMedia Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9509-2694
John NovembreDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5345-0214
Michael M DesaiDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9581-1150

Funding

Microbial Adaptation and the Statistics of Epistasis and PleiotropyR01GM104239 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DESAI, MICHAEL M · 2013 to 2025
$4.5M
Population Genetic Consequences of Recent Explosive Population Growth in HumansR01GM108805 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, KEINAN, ALON · 2014 to 2017
$2.2M
Theory, Methods, and Resources for Understanding and Leveraging Spatial Variation in Population Genetic DataR35GM149521 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI John Novembre · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
Haplotype-based analysis methods for population genomicsR01HG007089 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NOVEMBRE, JOHN · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
Chicago Fellows ProgramHarvard Faculty of Arts and SciencesNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007089NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104239NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108805NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149521NIH HHS GM108805NSF GM104239Research Computing CenterUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Research Computing Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demographic inference methods in population genetics typically assume that the ancestry of a sample can be modeled by the Kingman coalescent. A defining feature of this stochastic process is that it generates genealogies that are binary trees: no more than 2 ancestral lineages may coalesce at the same time. However, this assumption breaks down under several scenarios. For example, pervasive natural selection and extreme variation in offspring number can both generate genealogies with "multiple-merger" events in which more than 2 lineages coalesce instantaneously. Therefore, detecting violations of the Kingman assumptions (e.g. due to multiple mergers) is important both for understanding which forces have shaped the diversity of a population and for avoiding fitting misspecified models to data. Current methods to detect deviations from Kingman coalescence in genomic data rely primarily on the site frequency spectrum (SFS). However, the signatures of some non-Kingman processes (e.g. multiple mergers) in the SFS are also consistent with a Kingman coalescent with a time-varying population size. Here, we present a new statistical test for determining whether the Kingman coalescent with any population size history is consistent with population data. Our approach is based on information contained in the 2-site joint frequency spectrum (2-SFS) for pairs of linked sites, which has a different dependence on the topologies of genealogies than the SFS. Our statistical test is global in the sense that it can detect when the genome-wide genetic diversity is inconsistent with the Kingman model, rather than detecting outlier regions, as in selection scan methods. We validate this test using simulations and then apply it to demonstrate that genomic diversity data from Drosophila melanogaster is inconsistent with the Kingman coalescent.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGene FrequencyPopulation Densitybeta coalescentdemographic inferenceKingman coalescentmultiple mergers

Identifiers

PMID39919046
PMCPMC12005255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.