Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918978›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

CAPI-Detect: machine learning in capillaroscopy reveals new variables influencing diagnosis.

Gema M Lledó-Ibáñez, Luis Sáez Comet, Mayka Freire Dapena, Miguel Mesa Navas, Miguel Martín Cascón, Alfredo Guillén Del Castillo, Carmen Pilar Simeon, Elena Martinez Robles, José Todolí Parra, Diana Cristina Varela and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Gema M Lledó-IbáñezDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Institut Clinic de Medicina i Dermatologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0425-6519
Luis Sáez CometDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Mayka Freire DapenaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario de SAntiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7087-4091
Miguel Mesa NavasRheumatology Department, Clínica Universitaria Bolivariana, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5625-6791
Miguel Martín CascónDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8987-7460
Alfredo Guillén Del CastilloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-507X
Carmen Pilar SimeonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena Martinez RoblesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-6506-8746
José Todolí ParraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario La Fé, Valencia, Spain.
Diana Cristina VarelaRheumatology Department, Hospital General de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6935-9615
Génesis MaldonadoVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3978-0799
Adela MarínDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Laura Pérez AbadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jimena AramburuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0009-0003-1685-7973
Laura VelaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Eduardo Ramos IbáñezIngeniero Informático, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4931-2190
Borja Del Carmelo Gracia TelloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3248-2908

Funding

Aragon Health Research InstituteBoehringer Ingelheim SpainSpanish Society of Internal MedicineSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) is the gold standard for diagnosing SSc and differentiating primary from secondary RP. The CAPI-Score algorithm, designed for simplicity, classifies capillaroscopy scleroderma patterns (CSPs) using a limited number of capillary variables. This study aims to develop a more advanced machine learning (ML) model to improve CSP identification by integrating a broader range of statistical variables while minimizing examiner-related bias.

methodsA total of 1780 capillaroscopies were randomly and blindly analysed by three to four trained observers. Consensus was defined as agreement among all but one observer (partial consensus) or unanimous agreement (full consensus). Capillaroscopies with at least partial consensus were used to train ML-based classification models using CatBoost software, incorporating 24 capillary architecture-related variables extracted via automated NVC analysis. Validation sets were employed to assess model performance.

resultsOf the 1490 capillaroscopies classified with consensus, 515 achieved full consensus. The model, evaluated on partial and full consensus datasets, achieved 0.912, 0.812 and 0.746 accuracy for distinguishing SSc from non-SSc, among SSc patterns, and between normal and non-specific patterns, respectively. When evaluated on full consensus only, accuracy improved to 0.910, 0.925 and 0.933. CAPI-Detect outperformed CAPI-Score, revealing novel capillary variables critical to ML-based classification.

conclusionsCAPI-Detect, an ML-based model, provides an unbiased, quantitative analysis of capillary structure, shape, size and density, significantly improving capillaroscopic pattern identification.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMicroscopic AngioscopyNailsScleroderma, SystemicAdultAlgorithmsCapillariesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCatBoost algorithmdisease patternexaminer consensusmachine learning-based modelnailfold capillaroscopyquantitative analysissoftware-based analysissystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID39918978
PMCPMC12107046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.