ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2025
Temporal Dynamics and Representational Consequences of the Control of Processing Conflict between Visual Working Memory and Visual Perception.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attractive serial dependence arises during decision-making.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- EEG Correlates of Active Removal from Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual working memory (WM) extensively interacts with visual perception. When information between the two processes is in conflict, cognitive control can be recruited to effectively mitigate the resultant interference. The current study investigated the neural bases of the control of conflict between visual WM and visual perception. We recorded the EEG from 25 human participants (13 male) performing a dual task combining visual WM and tilt discrimination, the latter occurring during the WM delay. The congruity in orientation between the memorandum and the discriminandum was manipulated. Behavioral data were fitted to a reinforcement-learning model of cognitive control to derive trial-wise estimates of demand for preparatory and reflexive control, which were then used for EEG analyses. The level of preparatory control was associated with sustained frontal-midline theta activity preceding trial onset, as well as with the strength of the neural representation of the memorandum. Subsequently, discriminandum onset triggered a control prediction error signal that was reflected in a left frontal positivity. On trials when an incongruent discriminandum was not expected, reflexive control that scaled with the prediction error acted to suppress the neural representation of the discriminandum, producing below-baseline decoding of the discriminandum that, in turn, exerted a repulsive serial bias on WM recall on the subsequent trial. These results illustrate the flexible recruitment of two modes of control and how their dynamic interplay acts to mitigate interference between simultaneously processed perceptual and mnemonic representations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.