ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2025
The Roles of Discrete Populations of Neurons Expressing Short Neuropeptide F in Sleep Induction in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep is of vital importance in our lives, yet we are far from understanding the neuronal networks that control the amount and timing of sleep. There is substantial conservation of known sleep-regulating transmitters, allowing for studies in simpler organisms to lead the way in gaining insight into the organization of sleep control circuits. In Drosophila melanogaster, we recently showed that optogenetic activation of neurons that produce the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-related transmitter short neuropeptide F (sNPF) increases time spent asleep. However, sNPF is expressed in several neuronal populations, and thus it is unknown which of those populations play roles in the sleep-promoting effect. In this study, we addressed this issue using a genetic approach to limit optogenetic activation to subsets of sNPF-expressing neurons. We found that sleep promotion was shorter-lived when cryptochrome (CRY)-positive neurons were excluded from being activated. Pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) neurons were not required for sleep promotion, nor were mushroom body (MB) neurons. Acute reactions to a short, 10-s period of optogenetic activation were largely unchanged by excluding activation of the three neuronal populations mentioned above. Together, these results suggest that clock neurons that are CRY-positive and PDF-negative are important contributors to the long-lasting sleep promotion produced by sNPF neuron activation. However, other neurons targeted by the sNPF-GAL4 driver appear to mediate the more rapid behavioral responses. Future studies will seek to identify these additional sNPF neuron populations and to determine how sNPF-expressing clock neurons act in concert with other neuronal circuits to promote sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.