Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918772›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Prediction of biochemical prostate cancer recurrence from any Gleason score using robust tissue structure and clinically available information.

Laura E Marin, Daniel I Zavaleta-Guzman, Jessyca I Gutierrez-Garcia, Daniel Racoceanu, Fanny L Casado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura E MarinInstitute of Omics Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru.
Daniel I Zavaleta-GuzmanInstitute of Omics Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru.
Jessyca I Gutierrez-GarciaInstitute of Omics Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru.
Daniel RacoceanuSorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Fanny L CasadoInstitute of Omics Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima, Peru. fanny.casado@pucp.edu.pe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopsy information and protein Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels are the most robust information available to oncologists worldwide to diagnose and decide therapies for prostate cancer patients. However, prostate cancer presents a high risk of recurrence, and the technologies used to evaluate it demand more complex resources. This paper aims to predict Biochemical Recurrence (BCR) based on Whole Slide Images (WSI) of biopsies, Gleason scores, and PSA levels. A U-net model was used to segment phenotypic features and trained on images from the Prostate Cancer Grade Assessment (PANDA) database to segment tumorous regions from pre-processed and scored WSI of biopsies. Then, the model was tested on data from publicly available repositories achieving an Intersection over Union of 87%. Tissue features, Gleason scores, and PSA levels provided high accuracy and precision in classifying patients according to their risk of presenting recurrence, for any Gleason score sampled. The trained classifier model demonstrated a 79.2% relative accuracy, and a precision of 69.7% for patients experiencing recurrences before 24 months. Our results provide a robust, cost-efficient approach using already available information to predict the risk of BCR.

Indexed as

Biochemical recurrenceGleason scoreHematoxylin and Eosin stainingProstate cancerU-Net architectureWhole slide histopathology image

Identifiers

PMID39918772
PMCPMC11805747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.