ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Development and Validation of a Synoptic Operative Report as a Quality Indicator for Thyroid Surgery: A Canadian Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNarrative operative reports (NORs) often lack key information that can guide postoperative management of thyroid disease. We aimed to develop and validate a nationally standardized synoptic operative report (SOR) for thyroid surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsSurgeons were surveyed for their opinions of current operative reporting practices. Reportable elements from thyroidectomy NORs were ranked by thyroid disease specialists and reviewed by a national advisory committee to develop a standardized SOR using the Modified Delphi Method. Six thyroid surgeons piloted the SOR. Completeness and reporting frequencies of SOR elements were compared with pre-pilot NORs using Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-squared, and Fisher's exact analyses. A post-pilot survey assessed provider satisfaction.
resultsAmong 42 Canadian thyroid surgeons from 9 provinces, 31% expressed dissatisfaction with current reporting practices and 100% expressed interest in a SOR. In total, 109 reportable thyroidectomy elements were collected from 142 NORs and ranked by 46 thyroid disease specialists. Consensus agreed upon a 21-element SOR by a national advisory committee. Among 172 NORs and 170 piloted SORs, SORs had higher median overall completeness (100% [100-100%]) than NORs (65% [47-70%], p < 0.001). SORs improved reporting of cancer-specific elements, including the presence of gross extrathyroidal cancer extension (SOR: 100%, NOR: 43%, p < 0.001) and residual gross disease (SOR: 100%, NOR: 16%, p < 0.001). More than half of users and readers reported improved reporting completeness and impact on patient care with SORs.
conclusionsImplementation of a nationally developed thyroid surgery SOR enhanced completeness, delivery of cancer-specific information, and provider satisfaction, which can improve quality of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39918752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.