ArticleInfection2025
Evaluation of systemic inflammatory response following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a pathway to rational antibiotic use.
Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Mechanisms, Risk Stratification, and Therapeutic Implications.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Letter to the editor: balancing inflammation and infection: reflections on antibiotic stewardship post- TAVR.Infection · 2026Article
- Fibrin clot strength is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events after TAVR.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeElevations in inflammatory markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) often lead to preemptive antibiotic therapy (ABT). Distinguishing between physiological inflammatory reaction and true infection is crucial for rational ABT use.
methodsThis retrospective study included 1275 consecutive TAVR patients from January 2020 to July 2022. Infectious foci, ABT administration, and inflammatory markers over seven days post-procedure were evaluated. Using multivariable logistic regression, predictors for infection were identified and integrated into the Risk of Infection After TAVR (RIAT) score.
resultsAn infectious focus was retrospectively identified in 2.6% of patients, while 11.4% received ABT. Distinct trends in body temperature (BT), white blood cells (WBC), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were noted, with BT and WBC peaking on day 1 and CRP on day 3. Significant predictors of infection included a rise in BT of ≥ 0.2 °C between day 1 and 3 (odds ratio [OR] 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-6.88, p = 0.006), elevated WBC counts ≥ 12 × 10
conclusionOur findings indicate significant ABT overuse among TAVR recipients, likely due to misinterpretation of postoperative physiological reactions. Incorporating specific changes and thresholds of BT, WBC, and CRP post-TAVR into the RIAT score improved risk prediction for infection, underscoring its utility in enhancing antibiotic stewardship in this growing patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.