Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918722›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025

The 1001 nights-cohort - paving the way for future research on working hours, night work, circadian disruption, sleep, and health.

Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen, Anne Emily Saunte Fiehn Arup, Mette Sallerup, Rikke Harmsen, Anna Sofie Ginty, Marie Tolver Nielsen, Anne-Sofie Rosenfeldt Jensen, Anders Aagaard, Vivi Schlünssen, Ann Dyreborg Larsen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kirsten Nabe-NielsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark. knn@nfa.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4298-1420
Anne Emily Saunte Fiehn ArupThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8394-8351
Mette SallerupThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-514X
Rikke HarmsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5658-2851
Anna Sofie GintyThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8573-2312
Marie Tolver NielsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6143-4085
Anne-Sofie Rosenfeldt JensenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6692-2990
Anders AagaardThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5215-0248
Vivi SchlünssenDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for Environment, Occupation and Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4915-1734
Ann Dyreborg LarsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3587-2998
Anne Helene GardeThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1553-2291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Night work and circadian disruption are linked to major public health challenges, e.g. cancer, cardiometabolic disease, and accidents. We established the 1001 nights-cohort to explore mechanisms underlying health effects of night work and circadian disruption. 1075 female hospital employees participated from September 2022 to April 2024. The data collection included a questionnaire, a blood sample, anthropometric measures, and sleep actigraphy and sleep diaries across 14 days. In subsamples, light exposure, physical activity, skin temperature, and blood glucose were measured continuously for 7 days, and saliva samples were collected five times across one day. The cohort consists of 2- and 3-shift workers with night work (66%), permanent night workers (7%), permanent evening workers or 2-shift workers without night work (9%), and permanent day workers (18%). Data comprise 4553 day shifts, 997 evening shifts, 1963 night shifts, and 6458 days without work. The poorest health was observed among permanent night workers and the group of shift workers without night work. The 1001 nights-cohort is the most comprehensive data within night work and working hour research due to the combination of questionnaires, biomarkers, technical measurements, and possibilities for linkage to historical and future register-based information about working hours from the Danish Working Hour Database (DAD) and diagnoses. With its repeated measurements within the same individual, the cohort will advance research on physiological and behavioral mechanisms underlying health effects of working hours, night work, and circadian disruption and deliver important scientific input for updating guidelines on healthy scheduling of working hours.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmHealth StatusShift Work ScheduleSleepWork Schedule ToleranceAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBiobankCancerCardiometabolic diseasesMental healthWearablesWorking hours

Identifiers

PMID39918722
PMCPMC12137381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.