ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
One-stage posterior-only correction in severe and rigid scoliosis exceeding 90°: radiographic and surgical outcomes.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing pedicle morphology in pediatric spinal deformity: can magnetic resonance imaging match computed tomography? A systematic review.Spine deformity · 2026Pooled it
- Is there an added benefit of intraoperative traction to posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Lumbar Muscle Morphology Correlates With Early Surgical Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Pilot Study.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Management of Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Best practices and controversies.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeScoliosis, if left untreated, can lead to severe curvatures exceeding 90°, causing devastating functional impairments. Various surgical methods exist, but the optimal approach is still debated. One-stage posterior spinal fusion (PSF)-only surgery is gaining favor for its comparable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This study, focusing on radiographic and surgical outcomes, evaluates the efficacy and safety of one-stage PSF for scoliosis curves over 90° in pediatric patients.
methodsThirty-five pediatric patients with scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) who underwent one-stage posterior spinal fusion (PSF)-only surgery from January 2020 to December 2023 were included. Patients with idiopathic, neuromuscular, or syndromic scoliosis were included. The primary outcome was the correction rate (CR) of scoliosis curves. Secondary outcomes included major postoperative complications, surgery duration, blood loss, and hospital stay length. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical data were analyzed.
resultsThe mean CR for major and minor curves was 65.2 ± 10.5% and 57.9 ± 12.8%, respectively. The mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angle of major and minor curves was 102.6° and 35.6°, 68.6° and 28.8°, respectively. There were 13 recorded complications, with only one being life-threatening. Mean blood loss was 787 ± 437 ml. Total surgical time was roughly 5 h per case. The mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 9 days.
conclusionsPSF-only surgery for severe scoliosis over 90° is effective and safe. It supports using posterior-only methods as a viable alternative to combined approaches, suitable for patients with even more severe curves when their condition allows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39918694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.