Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918688›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025

A novel ypN-TRG staging system for gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy based on the metro-ticket paradigm: a multicenter and large sample retrospective analysis.

Cai-Ming Weng, Qing Zhong, Yu-Qin Sun, Zhi-Yu Liu, Yu-Bin Ma, Zhi-Quan Zhang, Hao-Xiang Zhang, Ji-Yun Zhu, Wen Ye, Ju Wu and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical-radiomic prognostic model integrating staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Cai-Ming Weng *Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Qing Zhong *Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Yu-Qin Sun *Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Zhi-Yu LiuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Yu-Bin MaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, Qinghai, China.
Zhi-Quan ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Hao-Xiang ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Ji-Yun ZhuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Wen YeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, Fujian, China.
Ju WuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
He DuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, Qinghai, China.
Chao-Hui ZhengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Qi-Yue ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Chang-Ming HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Jian-Wei XieDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xin-Quan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China. xjwhw2019@163.com.

Funding

the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital Talent Launch Fund Project 2024XH007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional ypT category evaluates the depth of invasion after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for gastric cancer (GC) and has limited prognostic value. Tumor regression grade (TRG) measures the extent of tumor response to treatment, and when combined with the ypN category, it may enhance the prediction of patient outcomes. This study aims to develop a new staging system by integrating TRG and ypN category to better evaluate the prognosis of GC patients receiving NAT.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 962 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy after NAT, with 513 in the development cohort (from one center) and 449 in the external validation cohort (from five centers). The ypN-TRG staging system was established by calculating the distance from the origin on a cartesian plane incorporating the ypN (x-axis) stage and TRG (y-axis) grade, and five sub-stages were delineated.

resultsIn the development cohort, 3-year overall survival rates according to ypN-TRG stage I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIB were 87.6%, 80.2%, 70.7%, 47.3%, 21.5%, p < 0.01. Compared with ypTNM, the ypN-TRG staging system performed better in terms of the prognostic discrimination power (C-index), goodness-of-fit (AIC, BIC), model improvement (NRI, IDI), and model stability (time-AUC). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed the superiority of ypN-TRG over ypTNM staging. In the external validation cohort, ypN-TRG staging was a better predictor of OS and DFS in patients with GC.

conclusionsThe ypN-TRG staging system is superior to the AJCC eighth edition ypTNM staging system in accurately assessing the prognosis of patients with GC after NAT.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateGastric cancerNeoadjuvant therapyPrognosisTNM stagingTumor regression grade

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.