Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918679›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025

Rescue cannulation techniques in difficult biliary access-A comprehensive review.

Pardhu Bharat Neelam, Harshal S Mandavdhare

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Navigating difficult biliary cannulation: Is pancreatic guidewire-assisted fistulotomy the preferred route?Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pardhu Bharat NeelamDepartment of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Harshal S MandavdhareDepartment of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India. hmandavdhare760@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8020-9848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective biliary cannulation is the prerequisite for successful biliary interventions. In the setting of cannulation failure, various rescue cannulation techniques are used for achieving selective biliary access. The various rescue cannulation techniques are (1) free-hand techniques (precut papillotomy and fistulotomy); (2) wire-guided techniques (transpancreatic sphincterotomy [TPS] and double guidewire [DGW]) and (3) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided technique (EUS-guided rendezvous for biliary access). The morphology of the papilla is the best guide to select the rescue technique. For classic and pendulous down facing papilla, pre-cut fistulotomy is preferable while for irregular ridged type, pre-cut papillotomy is suitable, while for small flat type, a very cautious pre-cut papillotomy may be utilized only by experts in pre-cut techniques. When an inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation occurs, TPS is the preferred technique for all except small flat type of papilla where DGW is preferable to avoid perforation. We review the literature comparing these techniques to assess their efficacy and safety. Finally, we provide an algorithm that can be used to select the best rescue technique.

Indexed as

CatheterizationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeSphincterotomy, EndoscopicAlgorithmsEndosonographyHumansBiliary cannulationDouble guidewireFistulotomyPapillotomyTranspancreatic sphincterotomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.