Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918658›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025

Survival benefit of conversion surgery for initially unresectable biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yanming Zhou, Qingxiang Wang, Mingjing Lin, Shijie Wang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanming ZhouSchool of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. zhouymsxy@sina.cn.
Qingxiang WangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Mingjing LinSchool of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shijie WangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCombination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) is the current first-line treatment for unresectable biliary tract cancer (UR-BTC), but it confers a median overall survival (OS) of less than one year. This study aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of conversion surgery for initially UR-BTC.

methodsEligible studies published between January 2000 and May 2024 were identified via an electronic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases. The primary endpoint was OS.

resultsIncluded in this study were 96 observational studies involving 466 patients with 231 cases (49.6%) of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 131 cases of (28.1%) extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 104 cases (22.3%) of gallbladder cancer. The 90-day mortality rate was 4.3%, and the median survival duration was 36.8 (17.9-57.6) months, with a 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rate of 86% (74-95.9%), 59.9% (32.3-78.7%), and 41.1% (24-58.5%) respectively. Meta-analysis showed that survival in patients who underwent conversion surgery was significantly higher than that in those who received non-surgical treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, P < 0.001) and comparable to that in those who underwent up-front surgery for resectable cancer (HR 1.02, P = 0.43). Pooled analysis of 149 individual participant data showed that male gender (HR 20.649, P = 0.014) and lymph node metastasis (HR 14.671, P = 0.005) were independently associated with reduced OS.

conclusionConversion surgery is justified in initially UR-BTC with favorable long-term survival, and may prove to be a promising option for the multimodality treatment of UR-BTC.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsConversion to Open SurgeryHumansSurvival RateBiliary tract cancerChemotherapySurgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID39918658
PMCPMC11805778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.