Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918591›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2025

Construction and validation of the motives for smartphone use questionnaire.

Beau Mostyn Sullivan, Amanda M George, Debra Rickwood

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beau Mostyn SullivanDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8029-076X
Amanda M GeorgeDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-973X
Debra RickwoodDiscipline of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4227-0231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Smartphones have been so widely adopted that many consider them essential for modern life. However, some people use their phone excessively, which can cause functional impairment or harm, termed problematic smartphone use (PSU). Smartphone use motives may help explain why users engage in general smartphone use and PSU, but existing measures may not capture certain motives which research suggests are important to smartphone use. To address this, across two studies, we constructed and validated a Motives for Smartphone Use Questionnaire (MSUQ) among young adults. Methods and results: In Study 1, the Delphi method was used, whereby engagement with a panel of 23 international academic experts resulted in a pool of 62 smartphone use motives items that measure 11 proposed motives. In Study 2, the 62 items were administered to 680 young adults aged 18-25 years (Mage = 22.50, SD = 2.16). Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses found that the MSUQ has a seven-factor structure, assessing smartphone use to cope, pass time, socialize, obtain social comfort, feel safe, fulfil social obligations, and seek information. These motives differentially influenced PSU and smartphone usage. Conclusions: The MSUQ is a valid measure of motives for smartphone use. It was developed specifically for smartphone use and it includes motives not captured in prior measures.

Indexed as

MotivationPsychometricsSmartphoneAdolescentAdultDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDelphifactor analysismobile phonesmotivesproblematic smartphone usescale development

Identifiers

PMID39918591
PMCPMC11974415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.