ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Gene Variant Spectrum in Probands With Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy Using an Expanded Panel.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparisons of Genetic and Clinical Findings in Patients with Syndromic to Non-Syndromic Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A novel variant p.Y250C of FZD4 influences Norrine/β-catenin signaling pathway that associates with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical and Multimodal Imaging Features of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy: The Genetic and Phenotypic Spectrum.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Kinesin Spindle Protein (KIF11) in Mitosis and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Five novel pathogenicAdvances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the gene variant spectrum in patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR). Methods: Probands clinically diagnosed with FEVR and their relatives were enrolled and clinical information and DNA collected. An expanded FEVR panel was used, including six recognized FEVR genes (FZD4, NDP, LRP5, TSPAN12, ZNF408, and CTNNB1) and 19 genes previously associated with ocular features overlapping FEVR (FEVR-associated genes). Variants identified using targeted next-generation sequencing and/or Sanger sequencing were analyzed and classified using the American College of Medical Genetics and Clinical Genome Resource Sequence Variant Interpretation (ClinGen SVI) working group recommendations to detect disease-causing variants (DCVs). Results: Analyses of data from a cohort of 94 probands provided a molecular diagnosis for 39 (41.5%) probands: 34 (87.2%) had a single DCV, whereas 5 (12.8%) harbored more than 1 DCV. Of 41 total DCVs in solved probands, 33 (80.5%) were in 4 of the 6 recognized genes, LRP5, FZD4, TSPAN12, and NDP, whereas 8 were found in FEVR-associated genes, 6 in KIF11, and 2 (LAMA1 and DOCK6) each in association with a KIF11 DCV. Reanalyzing variants using the latest criteria impacted the variant classification in five probands (5.3%), changing variants that were once deemed likely pathogenic to variants of uncertain significance. Conclusions: The expanded FEVR gene panel detected DCVs in nearly one-half of our cohort. Including the criteria used in classification will improve transparency of variant calls as more data become available. Four FEVR genes account for most cases, and the role of rare FEVR genes and candidate genes requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.