Trial reportThe Gerontologist2025
A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Visual Cues, Signage, and Spaced Retrieval for Wayfinding Within Long-Term Care Communities.
Trial report in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesWayfinding can be challenging in many long-term care communities (LTCCs) due to size, poor visibility, inadequate wayfinding design, as well as cognitive impairment of some residents. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of distinctive cues and signage placed at key points within care communities, with and without a trained memory strategy called spaced retrieval (SR), on wayfinding ability and life-space. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methods15 LTCCs were randomized to control (arm 1), cues (arm 2), or cues + SR (arm 3). Data were collected at baseline, and months 1, 3, 6 and 12. Wayfinding speed and accuracy (co-primary outcomes) were tested on three routes (simple, moderate, and complex) in each site. The secondary outcome was self-reported life-space. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects and generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze repeated measures of the outcomes in relation to trial arm.
resultsWayfinding speed was significantly greater on the simple route for the cues condition compared to control. On the moderate and complex routes, there were no differences in speed among trial arms. In terms of errors, participants in cues and cues + SR conditions performed significantly better than control participants, and arm cues + SR performed better than cues alone. There were no differences in life-space among arms. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The addition of age-friendly signs and art-cues assisted residents of LTCCs to find their way more effectively than no intervention, and there were fewer errors with SR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.