Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918328›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025

Hands-on learning for probiotic quality assessment: enhancing microbiology education through applied microbial counting techniques.

Nicola Mangieri, Stefania Arioli, Pasquale Russo, Diego Mora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicola MangieriDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3817-0457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial plate count continues to be an essential technique in food microbiology research and quality control. In food science education, this technique is often taught through traditional fact-based methods, requiring students to follow pre-established protocols. This approach may not fully engage students or enhance their problem-solving skills. Eighty-two final-year Food Science and Technology bachelor's students at the University of Milan were asked to combine their knowledge on general microbiology and microbial physiology for quality assessment of different probiotic products, including freeze-dried cells, fermented milk, and bacterial spore suspension. They were required to select the appropriate culture media, incubation conditions, and treatments based on flow cytometry cell quantification to optimize microbial plate counts and selectively count the different microbial species present in the probiotic formulations. The project aimed to bridge theoretical knowledge with practical applications, emphasizing the most appropriate procedure for viable and cultivable cell quantification, particularly relevant in probiotic formulation. Survey feedback indicated high satisfaction and relevance to future careers, with the majority finding the activity challenging yet engaging. The project demonstrated the effectiveness of combining different microbiological techniques in education, fostering a deeper understanding of the cultivability of probiotics and the role of selective agents.

Indexed as

biology educationfood microbiologyprobioticsquality controlselective media

Identifiers

PMID39918328
PMCPMC12020796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.