ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2025
Multi-task AI models in dermatology: Overcoming critical clinical translation challenges for enhanced skin lesion diagnosis.
Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Automated Skin Lesion and Cancer Detection Using Computer Vision: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- XAI-MedNet: A Next-Generation Explainable AI Framework for Contrast-Enhanced Skin Lesion Classification via Entropy-Controlled Optimization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated Quantification of Shedding Hairs from Smartphone Photographs Using an AI Tool for Alopecia Monitoring.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Multi-task AI models in dermatology: Overcoming critical clinical translation challenges for enhanced skin lesion diagnosis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Article
- Hierarchical skin lesion image classification with prototypical decision tree.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe surge in AI models for diagnosing skin lesions through image analysis is notable, yet their clinical implementation faces challenges. Common limitations include an over reliance on dermoscopy, lack of real-world applicability when only binary output (e.g. benign/malignant) is offered and low accuracy when faced with rare skin conditions.
objectivesTo address these common constraints associated with limited diagnostic output, and applicability to real-world settings.
methodsWe developed an All-In-One Hierarchical-Out of Distribution-Clinical Triage (HOT) AI model for skin lesion analysis. Trained on a large dataset of ~208,000 lesion images, our HOT AI model generates three outputs: a hierarchical three-level prediction, an alert for out-of-distribution (OOD) images and a recommendation for dermoscopy to improve diagnostic prediction.
resultsOur hierarchical prediction output provides a binary level 1 prediction (benign/malignant), Level 2 prediction of eight possible categories (e.g. melanocytic and keratinocytic) and a more definitive Level 3 prediction from 44 lesion categories. The model produced high sensitivity for Level 1 prediction (88.14% CI: 87.42-88.51); however, significantly lower for Level 3 prediction (63.90%, CI: 62.27-65.61). By relying on all three prediction levels for consensus, Level 1 false-positives were reduced by 20-25%, and false-negatives were decreased by 11-13% of cases. OOD detection was benchmarked against previous landmark models and outperformed comparative models. Lastly, 44% of images were recommended for dermoscopy, and with additional image input, Level 3 sensitivity increased from 48.13% (CI:45.08-49.57) to 52.54% (CI:50.25-55.04).
conclusionsOur HOT-AI model attempts to address common challenges in existing models by combining three tasks in one model to increase accuracy and clinical utility. By providing a more nuanced prediction, and alert for OOD, the model output provides greater explainability of the AI decision process. Prospective clinical testing is required to measure how this additional output impacts user trust, and how the model performs in a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.