ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
In Vivo Assessment of Plasma Gel: Regenerative Potential and Limitations as a Filler.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Periorbital Rejuvenation.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- A retrospective evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of an innovative penile enlargement approach: the Hardrock Sandwich Technique.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Adjunctive Use of Platelet-Derived Concentrates (Platelet-Rich Plasma, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Concentrated Growth Factor, Platelet-Poor Plasma) in Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: Current Evidence and Comparative Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Modulating rheology and bioactivity in dermal fillers: the emerging role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlasma gel, also known as plasma-rich in growth factors (PRGF) gel or platelet-rich gel, is a novel application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), created by heating platelet-poor plasma (PPP) to induce denaturation, forming a gel-like substance. This gel is then combined with PRP to create a new injectable biomaterial that offers both the regenerative benefits of PRP and structural support due to its gel-like consistency. Plasma gel has been increasingly used not only for its biological regenerative properties but also as a cosmetic filler to enhance tissue volume and improve skin aesthetics. It shows promise in facial rejuvenation by improving skin texture and elasticity, and reducing the appearance of wrinkles. However, the detailed in vivo behavior of plasma gel, particularly its absorption rate and regenerative efficacy, remains underexplored.
aimsThis study aims to investigate the in vivo behavior of plasma gel, focusing on its absorption rate and its ability to stimulate tissue regeneration. Specifically, we aim to assess how quickly plasma gel is absorbed after subcutaneous injection and to evaluate its effects on collagen production and neovascularization using a nude mouse model.
methodsPlasma gel was prepared by heating PPP to create a gel-like substance, which was then mixed with PRP. This mixture was injected subcutaneously into nude mice. The absorption of the gel was monitored over time by measuring the remaining volume at different time points. Tissue samples were analyzed using Masson's trichrome staining to detect collagen and CD31 immunohistochemical staining to assess neovascularization to understand the regenerative effects induced by plasma gel.
resultsThe study found that plasma gel is absorbed rapidly, with approximately 50% of the volume disappearing within the first week and almost complete absorption by eight weeks. Despite this rapid absorption, significant increases in collagen deposition and new blood vessel formation were observed, indicating strong regenerative properties even after the gel had been largely absorbed.
conclusionsThe main findings of this study suggest that while plasma gel is quickly absorbed and may not be suitable for long-term volumizing effects, it shows significant potential for temporary volume enhancement and as a biostimulatory agent. Plasma gel's ability to promote collagen production and neovascularization makes it valuable in clinical applications where temporary support and long-term tissue regeneration are desired. Future research should focus on ways to extend the retention time of plasma gel and enhance its regenerative effects, potentially through modifications to its formulation or combination with other bioactive substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.