Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39918170›Full record

ArticleEcology2025

Combining observational and experimental data to estimate environmental and species drivers of fungal metacommunity dynamics.

Hedvig Kristina Nenzén, Helen Moor, Robert B O'Hara, Mari Jönsson, Jenni Nordén, Elisabet Ottosson, Tord Snäll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hedvig Kristina NenzénSLU Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0189-4283
Helen MoorSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Robert B O'HaraDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Mari JönssonSLU Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jenni NordénNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8894-5815
Elisabet OttossonSLU Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tord SnällSLU Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the distribution and dynamics of species is central to ecology and important for managing biodiversity. The distributions of species in metacommunities are determined by many factors, including environmental conditions and interactions between species. Yet, it is difficult to quantify the effect of species interactions on metacommunity dynamics from observational data. We present an approach to estimate the importance of species interactions that combines data from two observational presence-absence inventories (providing colonization-extinction data) with data from species interaction experiments (providing informative prior distributions in the Bayesian framework). We further illustrate the approach on wood-decay fungi that interact within a downed log through competition for resources and space, and facilitate the succession of other species by decomposing the wood. Specifically, we estimated the relative importance of species interactions by examining how the presence of a species influenced the colonization and extinction probability of other species. Temporal data on fruit body occurrence of 12 species inventoried twice were jointly analyzed with experimental data from two laboratory experiments that aimed to estimate competitive interactions. Both environmental variables and species interactions affected colonization and extinction dynamics. Late-successional fungi had more colonization interactions with predecessor species than early-successional species. We identified several species interactions, and the presence of certain species changed the probability that later-successional species colonized by -81% to 512%. The presence of certain species increased the probability that other species went extinct from a log by 14%-61%. Including the informative priors from experimental data added two colonization interactions and one extinction interaction for which the observational field data was inconclusive. However, most species had no detectable interactions, either because they did not interact or because of low species occupancy, meaning data limitation. We show how temporal presence-absence data can be combined with experimental data to identify which species influence the colonization-extinction dynamics of others. Accounting for species interactions in metacommunity models, in addition to environmental drivers, is important because interactions can have cascading effects on other species.

Indexed as

EcosystemFungiModels, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsSpecies Specificitycolonization–extinction dynamicsdynamic occupancy modelmetacommunitymetapopulationspecies interactionswood‐decay fungi

Identifiers

PMID39918170
PMCPMC11804162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.