ArticleNeuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology2025
Bridging minds: Participant perspectives on postmortem brain research and engagement.
Article in Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- UC Irvine's Brain Initiative Cell Atlas Network (BICAN) Brain Procurement Program for the Center for Multiomic Human Brain Cell Atlas Project.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postmortem research participation remains underrepresented in research ethics discussions. Herein, we examined the associated perspectives of individuals preregistered with the Brain Bank for Aging Research at the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. We conducted a postal survey targeting 88 preregistrants, yielding 52 responses (response rate: 59.1%, average respondent age: 79.5 years, range: 49-97). The questionnaire gathered information on the reasons for agreeing to participate, helpful information provided during the explanation, and expectations regarding future information. The stated reasons for participating included a desire to contribute to science, gratitude for medical care received, memories of relatives' past donations, and inspiration from staff enthusiasm and materials. Beneficial information was given in brochures, coordinator explanations, and lectures; however, guidance for family members regarding postmortem procedures and updates on recent activities and research outcomes were highlighted as areas requiring future improvement. Willingness to participate in brain banks was influenced by altruistic factors, personal medical experiences, and the influence of statements from close contacts. Registrants maintained their interest after registration and prepare for future arrangements. Family cooperation was identified as a critical factor influencing the fulfillment of participant intentions, emphasizing the need for accessible and low-burden family guidance. Registrants generally seek information to help family members and associates avoid difficulties related to their participation. Brain banks should continue conducting such surveys for registrants and reflect the findings in their information dissemination and educational programs. This approach will help improve the understanding and support for brain bank participation, ultimately contributing to the advancement of medical research and ethics in postmortem studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.